Reprinted from The Cape Cod Times
Cope Cod Times
By PHIL
MATTINGLY
CONTRIBUTING WRITER
December 20, 2007
WASHINGTON - Once considered a fad
for the wealthy or a calculated risk for the poor, the option of traveling
overseas for medical procedures has hit the mainstream.
With more than 150,000 Americans
traveling out of the country for medical procedures and an estimated $20
billion in profits in 2006, the medical tourism industry has long since passed
fad status, according to Josef Woodman, author of "Patients Beyond Borders,"
a guidebook for those considering medical travel.
Woodman was one of the featured
speakers at the International Medical Tourism Conference, sponsored by Consumer
Health World (a medical conference management company), in early December in
suburban Washington, D.C., that attracted people from all over the world.
Doctors, CEOs and government
officials roamed the halls, and a host of men and women in power suits streamed
out of a meeting room, all speaking Spanish, as representatives from several
South American countries joined doctors and hospital managers from India,
Singapore and Thailand at the hotel in Arlington, Va..
Many of the foreign visitors had
booths in the downstairs exhibition area, set up to demonstrate the medical
capabilities available in their respective countries.
"The overwhelming reason people
go overseas is cost," said Woodman, who estimates savings between 25 and
75 percent on procedures done outside the United States. One of the featured
speakers at the conference was Dr.
Robert Crone, who until recently
served as dean for international programs at Harvard Medical School. Crone, who
played an integral role in setting up viable regional hospital facilities
throughout the world, doesn't just support medical tourism. In the case of some
elective procedures, he recommends the idea.
"Frankly, the U.S. loses when
it comes to cost," Crone said. "It's going to cost you 10 percent
less to get your heart fixed in Mumbai compared to what it will cost you in the
U.S. If you could have the same level of quality and a very substantial
decrease in cost, why not go to India?"
The difference in cost of a knee
replacement between an Indian hospital and the average American hospital is
$41,000, according to estimates by Wockhardt Hospitals, based in Mumbai, India,
and associated with Harvard Medical International. That difference in cost
jumps to between $50,000 and $70,000 for open-heart surgery.
The business plan is not foolproof,
though, and a number of roadblocks still lie in the path of a globally accepted
medical tourism industry. Chief among them might be perception, said Skip
Brickley, the conference organizer, referring to horror stories reported by the
media of overseas surgery going terribly wrong.
"You're always going to run
into some, as you have in the United States, that don't necessarily meet the
standards," said Brickley, president and CEO of Transmarx, a company
responsible for putting on conferences that bridge new technology and business.
"But by and large, the serious players in the international economy are as
well equipped for care as any hospital in the U.S."
Addressing another major roadblock
could eliminate the perception issue: the lack of a strict set of standards and
a regulatory body. "There have to be standardized rules and regulations
put in place so that globalization can occur," said Crone, something he
expects to be in place within a decade.
More than 140 overseas hospitals
already are accredited by Joint Commission International, a division of the
nonprofit Joint Commission, the largest accreditor of health care organizations
in the United States. That number is expected to triple in the next few years.
Another major concern has been
insurance coverage. Up to this point, medical travelers are largely paying out
of their own pockets. It will take a decision by the major insurance companies
to cover out-of-country procedures to really boost the industry, according to
Crone.
"The real change will occur
when the Aetnas and the Blue Crosses of the world offer international health care
as one of the options of their portfolio," Crone said. "Then I think
this will take off."
In March 2007, Blue Cross and Blue
Shield of South Carolina launched a subsidiary, Companion Global Healthcare, to
make travel arrangements and schedule appointments for medical procedures
outside the country. Crone said he expects other insurance companies to follow
suit within the next two years.
The industry also has spawned a
group of travel agents specializing in medical tourism. With deals linking
flights, hotels, hospitals and doctors, these companies are working to turn
medical travel from niche business into a booming industry.
"You will see increasing choice
and infrastructure," Woodman said. "It will get to the point where it
will be getting easier and easier to find the hospitals and make the travel
plans."
Though no one at the three-day
conference went so far as to say that medical tourism would reshape the
American health care system, all in attendance were clear that the industry is
in the midst of a rapid ascent.
"We're living in a global
economy; we've proven that in nearly every facet of business," Brickley
said. "And at the end of the day, medical tourism will produce one major
winner: the consumer."





Comments